Is "Jurassic World" Wrong for Portraying Dinosaurs without Feathers?

Fans of the Jurassic Park trilogy have been eagerly awaiting the release of a fourth movie, Jurassic World. This highly anticipated sci-fi film is set to be released in the US on June 12, 2015. Recently a trailer for the movie was released that has created a big buzz in the media. Reportedly, the film is going to be a "big disappointment" to dinosaur fans because "unlike the 1993 original, which was praised for its attention to detail and accuracy, the new film shows portrays [sic] its Tyrannosaurus Rex and velociraptors all wrong." One paleontologist made this comment: "The original film showed dinosaurs that were not simply roaring, scaly monsters but were active, social, bird-like animals with dynamic bodies. Now, Jurassic World is simply a dumb monster movie and there has been a deliberate effort to make its animals look different from the way we think they should." Apparently the problem with Jurassic World is that the dinosaurs -- including T. rex and velociraptor -- lack feathers, and therefore the movie is supposedly completely inaccurate.

Did Dinosaurs Have Feathers?

Many scientists today have accepted the idea that dozens of different species of dinosaurs were covered in feathers. This has resulted in recent artist's depictions showing dinosaurs covered in soft down or even flight-like feathers. These depictions are nothing short of bizarre and leave the dinosaurs looking quite ridiculous. But was Jurassic World wrong in leaving off the feathers and opting instead for the traditional scaly bodies?

[You can finish reading the rest of the article at Answers in Genesis. Click here.]